Translate this page into:
Navigating the unusual: A case of osteoid osteoma on the external skull table
*Corresponding author: Kumar Saket, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. saket0410@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Saket K, Alam P, Shweta VB, Dibakar S. Navigating the unusual: A case of osteoid osteoma on the external skull table. Karnataka Med J. 2025;48:22-25. doi: 10.25259/KMJ_1_2025
Abstract
Osteomas are benign, slow-growing tumours composed of mature bone, typically found in the paranasal sinuses and skull. Surgical excision is the preferred treatment, especially when the osteoma causes functional impairment, neurological symptoms or cosmetic concerns. This case report describes the successful removal of an osteoma from the external table of the skull using a chisel and mallet technique. The patient had a firm mass over the frontal region, which was confirmed as a well-circumscribed osteoma via radiographic imaging. The lesion was excised while preserving the surrounding tissues. Postoperatively, the patient had an uncomplicated recovery, with no recurrence at the 6-month follow-up. This case demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of using conventional tools for osteoma excision when the tumour is accessible, with minimal complication risk.
Keywords
Chisel and mallet
Osteoma
Outer skull table
INTRODUCTION
Osteomas are rare, benign bone tumors that typically develop in the paranasal sinuses and skull. These slow-growing lesions are often asymptomatic but may cause functional or cosmetic issues when they grow large enough. Surgical removal is the treatment of choice, particularly when the osteoma interferes with normal function, leads to neurological symptoms or poses aesthetic concerns.[1] While osteomas can be removed using various surgical techniques, the use of conventional tools like a chisel and mallet remains effective in certain cases, especially when the tumour is easily accessible. This case report presents the successful excision of an osteoma from the external table of the skull using this traditional approach.[2]
CASE REPORT
A 48-year-old female patient presented with a longstanding swelling over the right side of her forehead. The swelling was initially pea-sized when first noticed about 20 years ago and had gradually increased over time. The patient had been undergoing Ayurvedic treatment for joint pain during the progression of the swelling, but no other significant medical history was noted.
On clinical examination, a swelling approximately 2 × 2 cm in size was observed over the right frontal region [Figure 1]. The lesion was well-defined, non-tender and bony hard in nature. It was firm, non-fluctuant and fixed to the underlying bone. There were no signs of inflammation or skin changes over the swelling, and the overlying skin appeared normal.

- Pre-operative image showing the frontal swelling indicative of the osteoma, highlighting the area to be surgically accessed for excision. The lesion is clearly demarcated for accurate planning of the incision and approach.
Investigations
A non-contrast computed tomography scan of the skull was performed, which revealed a well-defined, homogeneous hyperdense lesion arising from the outer table of the right frontal bone. The lesion was consistent with an osteoma, a benign bony growth.
Surgical procedure
After discussing the nature of the lesion with the patient, it was explained that the swelling was benign and surgery was optional. The patient opted for surgical excision due to cosmetic concerns.
Anaesthesia
A ring block was administered using 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:80,000) to provide adequate local anaesthesia around the lesion. This ensured that the patient was comfortable and pain-free during the procedure.
Incision and exposure
A curvilinear incision was made over the dome of the swelling to ensure optimal exposure of the lesion while minimising post-operative scarring. The subcutaneous tissues and underlying soft tissues were carefully dissected to access the periosteum, which covered the bone and the lesion [Figure 2].

- Intraoperative image showing the curvilinear incision made over the dome of the swelling, with careful dissection of the subcutaneous and soft tissues to expose the periosteum covering the osteoma.
Periosteal access
Once the periosteum was identified, it was incised and reflected away from the underlying bone to reveal the osteoma. Precise dissection was performed to isolate the lesion from the surrounding bone structures, taking care to avoid damage to the adjacent bone.
Excision
The osteoma was excised, and careful attention was paid to ensure the complete removal of the lesion while preserving the integrity of the surrounding bone. After excision, the bony bed was inspected to confirm that no residual growth remained [Figure 3].

- Post-excision image of the osteoma confirming the complete removal of the lesion.
Histopathological examination
The excised specimen was sent for histopathological evaluation. The report confirmed the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma, consistent with the radiological findings and clinical presentation.
Contour restoration
Following the excision of the osteoma, the bony surface was smoothed using a flame-shaped bur. This was done to restore the natural contour of the frontal bone and ensure a cosmetically acceptable outcome.
Closure
The wound was closed in layers. The periosteum was approximated using absorbable sutures, and the skin was closed with a subcuticular stitch using 3-0 Vicryl to minimise scarring and provide a neat appearance. The closure was done carefully to ensure optimal healing and cosmetic results [Figure 4].

- Image showing the final closure of the wound in layers, with the periosteum approximated using absorbable sutures and the skin closed with a subcuticular stitch using 3-0 Vicryl for optimal cosmetic results.
Post-operative outcome
The procedure was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the same day. At the 7-day post-operative follow-up, the patient reported no complications. The surgical site showed good healing, with no signs of infection or wound dehiscence. The cosmetic results were satisfactory, and the patient was pleased with the outcome.
This case highlights the successful management of an osteoma in the frontal region, emphasising the importance of careful surgical technique, cosmetic considerations and good post-operative care to achieve optimal outcomes.
DISCUSSION
Osteomas are slow-growing, benign osseous tumours that typically affect the paranasal sinuses and skull. They are usually found by chance during radiological examinations and are asymptomatic. However, depending on their size and location, osteomas can occasionally exhibit clinical signs such as pain, swelling or neurological abnormalities. The frontal and parietal bones are most frequently affected, and osteomas frequently occur on the external table of the skull. The excision of these tumours is sometimes recommended for cosmetic purposes, to relieve symptoms or to avoid potential problems, including infection or strain on underlying structures, even though they seldom develop into malignant transformation.[3]
In this case report, we present a patient who had an osteoma over the frontal area on the external table of the skull. Clinical assessment was used to identify the mass, and radiographic imaging was used to confirm it. The imaging showed that the mass had the characteristic radiopaque look of an osteoma. A chisel and mallet technique, a time-honoured method that can still be successful and dependable in some situations, particularly in superficial skull lesions, was used to execute the surgical excision.[4]
Using a chisel and mallet gives the surgeon direct mechanical control, which is one benefit. The chisel enables the osteoma to be removed more slowly and carefully than power instruments, which might produce too much heat and run the danger of unintentionally damaging nearby soft tissues. The chisel is given a regulated force by the mallet, which facilitates the removal of the tumour without needlessly injuring the surrounding cranium. Furthermore, even in situations when access is restricted or the osteoma is located close to significant anatomical markers like the dural layer or major blood arteries, the chisel and mallet technique can be applied successfully.[5]
The recurrence rate of osteoid osteomas following complete surgical excision is extremely low. Literature suggests recurrence occurs in <1% of cases when the lesion is entirely removed, particularly when the nidus is fully excised. This supports the long-term effectiveness of surgical management for such benign skull tumours and correlates with the favourable outcome observed in this case.
CONCLUSION
Surgically excising osteomas from the skull’s external table with a chisel and mallet method is still a safe, dependable and efficient method, especially for lesions that are easily accessible and clearly delineated. Even though there are many contemporary methods for removing bone, the old-fashioned chisel and mallet approach still has its uses in some therapeutic settings because it provides good control and a low risk of problems. The effectiveness of this approach in treating benign skull tumours is demonstrated by this case, which offers positive results with low morbidity.
Authors’ contributions:
KS, PA, SVB, DS: Contributed equally to the design, writing, and revision of the manuscript. All have participated in the review of the article and approved the submitted version.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Surgical management of osteomas in the skull: A case series and literature review. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:565-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- Surgical treatment of benign osteomas of the skull and their long-term outcomes. Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29:245-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Benign osteomas of the skull: Case report and review of surgical approaches. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76:1484-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- Chisel and mallet technique for the excision of cranial osteomas: A safe and effective approach. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg. 2017;45:831-6.
- [Google Scholar]
- Management of skull osteomas: A review of techniques and outcomes. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;66:73-8.
- [Google Scholar]

