Translate this page into:
The relationship between dietary supplement usage habits and healthy eating attitudes among 1st and 5th year students of the faculty of pharmacy: The case of Trakya University
*Corresponding author: Pınar Zehra Davarcı, Department of Public Health, Edirne Provincial Health Directorate, Edirne, Turkey. zehrabuyukyazici@hotmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Davarcı PZ, Demircan YS, Şuekinci T, Şentürk E, Kavaz G. The relationship between dietary supplement usage habits and healthy eating attitudes among 1st and 5th year students of the faculty of pharmacy: The case of Trakya University. Karnataka Med J. 2025;48:56-61. doi: 10.25259/KMJ_26_2025
Abstract
Introduction:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines dietary supplements (DS) as products distinct from conventional foods, intended to supplement or complete the diet. This study aims to examine the relationship between the use of DS and attitudes towards healthy eating among 1st- and 5th-year students of the Faculty of Pharmacy at Trakya University.
Material and Methods:
This cross-sectional study included 1st- and 5th-year students from the Faculty of Pharmacy. Participants completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics and DS usage, along with the ‘Attitude Scale for Healthy Nutrition’.
Results:
Of the 160 students who participated in the study, 25.0% were male and 75.0% were female, and 56.0% were 1st-year pharmacy students. Fifth-year students were found to have significantly higher rates of awareness, usage and training on DS compared to 1st-year students (P < 0.005). Most participants received education on DS through faculty courses. A total of 92.9% of 5th-year students and 71.1% of 1st-year students reported using DS. The most commonly used DS were multivitamin preparations (32.9%). The average scores on the attitude scale for healthy nutrition (ASHN) were significantly higher among 5th-year students, those who primarily consumed home-prepared meals and those who exercised regularly, compared to 1st-year students, those who frequently consumed ready-made foods and those who did not exercise regularly (P < 0.005). No significant difference was observed between DS usage and the average scores on the ASHN (P > 0.005).
Conclusion:
DSs are widely used among the participants. No statistically significant relationship was found between DS usage and scores on the ASHN.
Keywords
Dietary supplement
Health
Healthy eating
Pharmacy student
INTRODUCTION
According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, dietary supplements (DS) are products distinct from conventional foods and are intended to supplement or complete the diet.[1] The Turkish Food Codex defines ‘nutritional supplements’ or ‘DS’ as products designed to complement normal nutrition, containing concentrated or extracted nutrients such as vitamins, minerals, proteins, carbohydrates, fibre, fatty acids, amino acids or other plant, herbal and animal-derived substances with nutritional or physiological effects as well as bioactive substances. These are formulated as capsules, tablets, lozenges, single-use powder packets, liquid ampoules, dropper bottles and other similar liquid or powder forms, with a specified daily intake dose.[2]
A balanced and adequate intake from the fundamental food groups is crucial for growth, development, maintaining good health, protecting and promoting wellness and reducing the risk of chronic diseases.[3] While some publications argue that DS is unnecessary with a sufficient and balanced diet, modern factors such as population growth, increased work demands and similar pressures can disrupt individuals’ dietary patterns, thereby creating a need for DS.[4]
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between DS usage and attitudes towards healthy eating among 1st and 5th year students at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Trakya University.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The population of this cross-sectional study consists of 1st- and 5th-year students at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Trakya University, during the 2024–2025 academic year. With a study population of 243, a power of 85% and α = 0.05, the sample size was calculated to be 146. Considering potential data loss, a 10% increase was added, resulting in a final sample size of 160. Based on the distribution of students, it was planned to include 91st-year and 75th-year participants. The study was conducted between 15 February 2024 and 15 May 2024.
Data collection instruments
Survey form
The 30 questions included in this form were developed by researchers based on information from the literature. Participants were asked questions assessing their sociodemographic characteristics (such as gender, age, academic year, height and weight, presence of chronic illnesses, known drug/food allergies, smoking and alcohol use, income level, geographical region of residence before starting university and frequency of physical activity) as well as their use of DS.
Attitude scale for healthy nutrition (ASHN)
The scale was developed by Gönül Tekkurşun Demir and Halil İbrahim Cicioğlu in 2019.[5] It comprises 21 items across four factors: ‘Knowledge about Nutrition’, ‘Feelings towards Nutrition’, ‘Positive Nutrition’ and ‘Poor Nutrition’. The scale uses a Likert-type rating for positive items: ‘Strongly Disagree’, ‘Disagree’, ‘Neutral’, ‘Agree’ and ‘Strongly Agree’. Higher scores on the scale indicate stronger positive attitudes toward nutrition, while lower scores suggest weaker attitudes. Score ranges are defined as follows: 21–48 indicates a low attitude score, 49–77 indicates a moderate attitude score and 78–105 indicates a high attitude score.
Data collection
Data was collected through face-to-face interviews. After participants were informed about the study, their verbal consent was obtained. Each interview lasted approximately 8–10 min.
Data analysis
Data were analysed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Statistics 21.0. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations. For continuous variables, skewness and kurtosis values within the range of ±2 were assumed to indicate normal distribution. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square, Independent Samples t-test and Pearson correlation analysis. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Ethics committee and other approvals for the study
Approval for the study was obtained from the Trakya University Scientific Research Ethics Committee (Protocol code: TÜTF-BAEK 2024/81). In addition, permissions were obtained from the Faculty of Pharmacy at Trakya University and from Gönül Tekkurşun Demir, the developer of the scale, to conduct the study.
RESULTS
The study included 120 female students (75.0%) and 40 male students (25%), with a mean age of 21.23 ± 2.85 years. Thirteen participants (8.1%) reported having a chronic illness. Seventeen students (10.6%) indicated they had a food or drug allergy. Among the participants, 34 (21.25%) were smokers, and 79 (49.3%) reported alcohol use. Smokers consumed an average of 15.23 ± 8.89 cigarettes per day. A total of 39 participants (24.3%) indicated that they exercise regularly. No statistically significant differences were found between 1st- and 5th-year pharmacy students regarding the presence of food or drug allergies, chronic illness status, smoking or alcohol use, amount of alcohol consumed, income level, dietary habits, regular exercise habits, self-assessed health status and average body mass index (BMI) (P > 0.05). The distribution of participants by year is presented in Table 1.
| Parameters | 1styear (n, %) | 5thyear (n, %) | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| Female | 75 (83.3) | 45 (65.7) | 0.010 | ||
| Male | 15 (16.7) | 25 (34.3) | |||
| Smoking status | |||||
| Yes | 16 (17.8) | 19 (27.1) | 0.155 | ||
| No | 74 (82.2) | 51 (72.0) | |||
| Alcohol consumption | |||||
| Yes | 39 (43.3) | 40 (57.1) | 0.083 | ||
| No | 51 (56.7) | 30 (42.9) | |||
| Amount of alcohol consumed* | |||||
| Several times per week | 7 (17.9) | 5 (12.5) | 0.121 | ||
| Several times per month | 23 (59.0) | 17 (42.5) | |||
| Several times per year | 9 (23.1) | 18 (45.0) | |||
| Income level | |||||
| Income less than expenses | 17 (18.9) | 12 (17.1) | 0.625 | ||
| Income equal to expenses | 57 (63.3) | 49 (70.0) | |||
| Income greater than expenses | 16 (17.8) | 9 (12.9) | |||
| Dietary habits | |||||
| Primarily home-cooked foods | 34 (37.8) | 33 (47.1) | 0.090 | ||
| Primarily processed foods | 15 (16.7) | 4 (5.7) | |||
| Balanced between home-cooked and processed foods | 41 (45.6) | 33 (47.1) | |||
| Regular physical activity | |||||
| Yes | 19 (21.1) | 20 (28.6) | 0.276 | ||
| No | 71 (78.9) | 50 (71.4) | |||
| Health-related research in the past month | |||||
| <4 times per month | 71 (78.9) | 34 (48.6) | 0.000 | ||
| 4 or more times per month | 19 (21.1) | 36 (51.4) | |||
| Self-assessment of health status | |||||
| Very good/good | 54 (60.0) | 49 (70.0) | 0.190 | ||
| Average/poor/very poor | 36 (40.0) | 21 (30.0) | |||
| Region of residence before university | |||||
| Marmara region | 68 (75.6) | 52 (74.3) | 0.856 | ||
| Other regions | 22 (24.4) | 18 (25.7) | |||
| BMI (Mean)† | 21.99±3.53 | 23.33±5.05 | 0.051 | ||
| Total | 90 (100.0) | 70 (100.0) | |||
A total of 147 participants (91.8%) reported having previously heard of the term DS, and 131 students (81.8%) indicated that they had used DS at least once in their lives. Statistically significant differences were found regarding DS education, DS usage and perceptions of DS prices as expensive (P < 0.005). Participant characteristics are presented in Table 2.
| Parameters | 1styear (n, %) | 5thyear (n, %) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| To have previously encountered the definition of a dietary supplement | |||
| Yes | 77 (85.6) | 70 (100.0) | 0.001 |
| No | 13 (14.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| To receive education related to dietary supplements | |||
| Yes | 14 (15.6) | 49 (70.0) | 0.000 |
| No | 76 (84.4) | 21 (30.0) | |
| Use of dietary supplements | |||
| Yes | 64 (71.1) | 65 (92.9) | 0.001 |
| No | 26 (28.9) | 5 (7.1) | |
| Opinions on the prices of dietary supplements | |||
| No opinion/cheap/reasonable | 42 (46.7) | 16 (22.9) | 0.003 |
| Expensive | 48 (53.3) | 54 (77.1) | |
| Assessment of knowledge level on dietary supplements | |||
| Very good/good | 11 (12.2) | 24 (34.3) | 0.001 |
| Moderate/poor/very poor | 79 (87.8) | 46 (65.7) | |
| Can herbal products be used as a substitute for medicine? | |||
| Yes/sometimes | 72 (80.0) | 54 (77.1) | 0.661 |
| No/no opinion | 18 (20.0) | 16 (22.9) | |
Bold values: P< 0.05.
The most common source of information on DS was reported to be university lectures (28.8%), and the product for which participants most desired; further, education was vitamins/multivitamins (18.9%). Among those who had used DS, 18.9% reported using vitamin/multivitamin preparations. Participants’ education, views and experiences related to DS are presented in Figure 1.

- Participants’ education, experience and opinions on dietary supplements. *Participants provided multiple responses to the questions.
In our study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the ASHN was found to be 0.822.
The mean scale scores were significantly higher among 5th-year students, those who primarily consumed home-prepared meals, those who exercised regularly, those who conducted more than four health-related searches in the past month and those who rated their own health as very good/good (P < 0.005). The associations between independent variables and scale scores are presented in Table 3.
| Parameters | Mean score obtained from the scale±standard deviation | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| Class | ||
| 1styear | 70.86±11.50 | 0.042 |
| 5thyear | 74.50±10.57 | |
| Gender | ||
| Female | 71.85±11.22 | 0.231 |
| Male | 74.33±11.16 | |
| Presence of food/drug allergies | ||
| Yes | 72.98 ±15.80 | 0.839 |
| No | 72.39±10.62 | |
| Chronic illness | ||
| Yes | 73.61±12.63 | 0.699 |
| No | 72.35±11.1 | |
| Smoking status | ||
| Yes | 73.57±10.96 | 0.508 |
| No | 72.14±11.32 | |
| Alcohol consumption status | ||
| Yes | 71.96±11.46 | 0.586 |
| No | 72.93±11.03 | |
| Income level | ||
| Income less than expenses | 71.90±10.65 | 0.771 |
| Income equal to or greater than expenses | 72.57±11.38 | |
| Dietary habits | ||
| Primarily home-prepared foods | 76.04±11.11 | 0.001 |
| Primarily processed foods or a balance between processed and home-prepared foods | 69.87±10.63 | |
| Regular physical exercise | ||
| Yes | 77.65±12.85 | 0.001 |
| No | 70.77±10.14 | |
| Perception of own health | ||
| Very good/good | 75.00±11.22 | 0.000 |
| Very poor/poor/moderate | 67.85±9.73 | |
| Region of residence before university | ||
| Marmara region | 72.78±11.49 | 0.522 |
| Other regions | 71.46±10.4 | |
| Research conducted in the past month | ||
| Four times per month | 70.94±10.52 | 0.018 |
| More than 4 times per month | 75.34±12.01 | |
| To have previously encountered the definition of a dietary supplement | ||
| Yes | 72.86±10.97 | 0.123 |
| No | 67.84±13.35 | |
| Received education on dietary supplements | ||
| Yes | 73.14±12.18 | 0.534 |
| No | 72.00±10.59 | |
| Use of dietary supplements | ||
| Yes | 72.73±11.58 | 0.530 |
| No | 71.31±9.66 | |
| Opinion on the price of dietary supplements | ||
| No opinion/reasonable/cheap | 70.23±9.53 | 0.059 |
| Expensive | 73.71±11.93 | |
| Use of herbal products as a substitute for medicine | ||
| Yes/sometimes | 72.32±11.36 | 0.777 |
| No/no opinion | 72.94±10.83 | |
| Assessment of knowledge level regarding dietary supplements | ||
| Very good/good | 74.91±13.03 | 0.143 |
| Moderate/poor/very poor | 71.76±10.62 | |
ASHN: Attitude scale for healthy nutrition, SD: Standard deviation, Bold values: P< 0.05.
No correlation was found between participants’ average BMI and their scores on the ASHN (P > 0.005).
DISCUSSION
This study presents the DS usage habits and attitudes towards healthy eating among 1st- and 5th-year students at the Trakya University Faculty of Pharmacy.
Approximately 90% of participants, including all 5th-year students, reported having heard the term ‘DS’ previously. Despite the absence of DS-related courses in the 1st-year pharmacy curriculum, participants’ familiarity with this term may stem from its popularity in society.
Among 5th-year students, 92.9% reported using DS, while 71.1% of 1st-year students reported the same. In a similar study among nursing students, 55.6% were found to use DS.[6] Consistent with previous studies, vitamins and multivitamin preparations were the most commonly used DS in our study.[6,7] Participants indicated that the products they most wished to receive training on were vitamins/multivitamins. This finding, consistent with both our study and results from other studies, may be associated with the higher prevalence of vitamin use as a common supplement.[8]
In a study involving athletes, the most frequently cited reason for supplement use was fat burning and fitness maintenance.[9] In contrast, in our study, students primarily reported using DS to boost energy.
In a study with university student-athletes, it was found that participants most commonly used DS on the recommendation of their coaches.[10] Similarly, in a study conducted among the general consumer group, participants reported obtaining DS from pharmacies, mostly based on physician recommendations.[7] In alignment with this finding, participants in our study who used DS also reported that they most often obtained their supplements from pharmacies following physician advice.
Fifth-year pharmacy students assessed the prices of DS as ‘expensive’ compared to 1st-year students. This perspective may be due to their higher usage of DS or their involvement in the sale of these products during internship periods.
In our study, no statistically significant difference was observed in ASHN scores between genders. This finding aligns with a study conducted among university students.[11] In a study involving medical faculty students, a statistically significant positive correlation was found between ASHN total scores and academic year.[12] Similarly, the higher scores of 5th-year students may be associated with health education included in the faculty curriculum. Notably, despite the World Health Organization’s explicit warnings about the harmful effects of smoking, there was no significant difference in ASHN scores between smokers and non-smokers – a remarkable finding. Those who primarily consumed homemade foods, engaged in regular physical activity, perceived their health status as very good/good and conducted health-related research more than 4 times per month scored significantly higher on the ASHN.
Although DS are used to complement nutrition, there are opinions suggesting that such supplements are unnecessary with adequate and balanced nutrition.[4] In our study, no statistically significant relationship was found between DS use, knowledge level, educational level, price perceptions and ASHN scores.
Limitations of the study
This study presents results from only 1st- and 5th-year students in a single faculty of pharmacy, so the findings cannot be generalised to all students.
CONCLUSION
DS is widely used among participants. However, no difference was found in the mean scale scores between pharmacy students who used DS and those who did not. The DS that participants most wished to receive information on, as well as the most commonly used DS, was multivitamins. Enhancing the awareness of future pharmacists who will work in primary healthcare regarding DS is crucial for the appropriate management of these increasingly popular products.
Acknowledgments:
We extend our gratitude to the pharmacy students who participated in this study.
Authors’ contributions:
PZD: Idea/hypothesis; PZD, YSD, TŞ, EŞ, GK: Design; YSD, TŞ, EŞ, GK: Data collection/Data processing; PZD: Data analysis; PZD, YSD, TŞ, EŞ, GK: Manuscript preparation.
Ethical approval:
The research/study approved by the Institutional Review Board at Trakya University, number TÜTF-BAEK 2024/81, dated 18th March 2024.
Declaration of patient consent:
Patient’s consent was not required as there are no patients in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial ıntelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: None.
References
- FDA 101 Dietary supplements Available from: https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/fda-101-dietary-supplements [Last accessed on 2025 Oct 26]
- 2013. Available from: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2013/08/20130816-16.htm [Last accessed on 2025 Oct 26]
- The nutritional habits of university students living in dormitories. Karadeniz. 2012;4:139-49.
- [Google Scholar]
- Attitude scale for healthy nutrition (ASHN): Validity and reliability study. Gaziantep Spor Bilimleri Derg. 2019;4:256-74.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Has the COVID-19 pandemic affected the use of dietary supplements? Van Tip Derg. 2021;28:538-45.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Relationship between nutrition and supplementary food use and fear of COVID-19 in nurses during the pandemic. Klimik Derg. 2021;35:147-54.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Determination of food supplement usage status of people in the gym. Saglik ve Yasam Bilimleri Derg. 2020;2:43-8.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Usage of nutritional supplements among university student athletes. Tip Fak Klin Derg. 2020;3:5-14.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Investigation of Turkish and foreign students' attitudes towards healthy eating at a university. Saglik Akademisyenleri Derg. 2023;10:654-60.
- [Google Scholar]
- Evaluation of obesity-related prejudice and attitude for healthy nutrition in medical students. Turk J Fam Med Prim Care. 2022;16:690-8.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

